Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-04-30 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-04-30 House Journal Page 1412 HB 228 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 228 "An Act relating to the offense of selling or giving tobacco to a minor, to the accounting of fees from business license endorsements for tobacco products, to the disclosure of certain confidential cigarette and tobacco product information, to notification regarding a cigarette manufacturer's noncompliance with the tobacco product Master Settlement Agreement, to 2001-04-30 House Journal Page 1413 business license endorsements for sale of tobacco products, to citations and penalties for illegal sales of tobacco products; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT CS(L&C) NT 5DP 1AM 1092 FN1: ZERO(REV); FN2: (LAW) 1093 FN3:(HSS); FN4:(CED) 1093 JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 1DP 3NR 1158 FN1: ZERO(REV); FN2: (LAW) 1159 FN3: (HSS); FN4: (CED) 1159 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 11DP 1234 FN1: ZERO(REV); FN2: (LAW) 1234 FN4: (CED); FN5: FORTHCOMING 1234 FN5: (HSS) RECEIVED 1286 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 228(FIN) "An Act relating to the accounting of fees from business license endorsements for tobacco products, to the disclosure of certain confidential cigarette and tobacco product information, to notification regarding a cigarette manufacturer's noncompliance with the tobacco product Master Settlement Agreement, to business license endorsements for sale of tobacco products, to citations and penalties for illegal sales of tobacco products; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Hayes: Page 3, line 6: Delete "$100" Insert "$50" 2001-04-30 House Journal Page 1414 Representative Hayes moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Harris objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 228(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Fate, Hayes, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Morgan, Moses, Ogan Nays: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Masek, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 228(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 228(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 228(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 228(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 35 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 2001-04-30 House Journal Page 1415 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Coghill, Kohring, Ogan Excused: Masek, Wilson And so, CSHB 228(FIN) passed the House. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 228(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.